SHANE, adapted from Jack Schaefer’s popular novel, is George Steven’s eulogy of a bygone civilization, the West as we know it. Its rub is pivoted around the hard-pressed homesteaders against the grasping prior trailblazers, who cannot brook the land they have been fighting for with sweat and blood, to be shared with peace-loving late comers. It all comes down to a gunslinger, our titular hero Shane (Ladd) to solve the problem, once and for all.
Unlike other trigger-happy cowpokes, Shane is perversely reluctant to shoot, apparently afflicted by some unexplained past trauma, he comes off as rather shell-shocked and doesn’t even brings his six-shooter with him when he goes to town, much to the bewilderment of a 10-year-old boy Joey Starrett (De Wilde), who puts Shane on a pedestal ever since his advent to the Starretts’ turf.
Hired by Joey’s father Joe (Heflin) to work in their land, Shane literally becomes another member of the nuclear family, heightened by a tangible mutual feeling between him and Joe’s wife Marian (Arthur), neither of them acts improperly, but there is chemistry simmering underneath their restrained formalities, which even Joe descries but he is also prudent enough to keep the green-eyed monster at bay.
The conflict escalates when their nemesis, the Ryker brothers, going out of their ways to scare and harass homesteaders off the land for their cattle business, hires a notorious gunfighter Jack Wilson (Palance), who viciously baits and dispatches anyone who is hot-headed enough to draw the gun, Frank Torrey (Cook Jr.) falls to his victim, however, during his funeral, the homesteaders are held together by Joe and decide to stand on their grounds, which prompts the Ryker brothers to set a trap to liquidate Joe, after a dusty brotherly brawl amid skittish horses and Marian’s screaming, it is Shane who takes Joe’s place to attend the treacherous invitation, with Joey secretively tailing behind to witness the final showdown, executed with a quick-fire fashion that invites pause and rewind. When the dust settles, a wounded (mortally or not, Stevens leaves us to guess) Shane chooses to leave as he confesses there is no place for a man who has blood on his hands, with Joey’s wail “Come back, Shane” resounds in the crescendo,
A stoical Alan Ladd is forever enshrined in Shane’s laconic, reserved persona and he is the unlikely hero excels in rough-and-tumble with a short stature, but the truth is, Van Heflin offers a more well-rounded performance as the ultimately congenial and sympathetic Joe, as for Jean Arthur, in her first color movie and celluloid swan song, hampered by an unflattering wig and over-airbrushed effort of the make-up team, she, at the very least, hangs tough through the familial dissension as a dyed-in-the-wool nay-sayer of the gun violence, that particularly rings a bell in today’s climate.
Receiving 6 Oscar nominations in toto (including BEST PICTURE, SCREENPLAY and DIRECTOR), one for the amazing tween actor Brandon De Wilde (who would sadly perish in a car accident at an age of 30), who benefits from the fact that the meat of the story takes place from his idolized standpoint, persuasively visualizes a wide-eyed boy’s vicarious thrills and spills without becoming overtly cutesy or annoying, too many bratty kids in real life already, no one needs to see them throw a hissy fit on the big screen. Also Jack Palance cops a back-to-back Oscar nomination after his breakthrough in David Miller’s SUDDEN FEAR (1952), brimful of vice and danger, his villainous turn is a real spine-tingler.
Equipped with a divinely colorful Technicolor to render a beauteous natural landscape, SHANE judiciously deviates from the mainstream Western with its prescience of its westering future, yet proposes an auspicious prospect on the horizon of the pending modern age, while those who are passé get a melancholic solace that at any rate, some good deeds are done, a few good seeds are sowed and some bad apples are annihilated. Lastly, one advise, dialing down the volume can save yourself from the assault of Victor Young’s blaring, overblown aural accompaniment, which aids our appreciation of George Stevens’ deathless classic of a defiant hero named SHANE.
referential entries: George Stevens’ GIANT (1956, 8.3/10), Fred Zinnermann’s HIGH NOON (1952, 8.0/10).
看《Logan》的时候就对电影里出现的两段《Shane》的台词印象十分深刻,后来才发现两部片子很多地方都是遥相呼应的。
“A man has to be what he is, Joey.Can’t break the mould.” “There's no living with a killing. There's no going back from one. Right or wrong, it's a brand,a brand sticks. There's no going back. Now you run on home to your mother and tell her, tell her everything's alright. And there aren't any more guns in the valley.”这两段台词放在狼叔身上也毫不违和,生活大抵是这样没有选择又无可奈何。
《金刚狼3》中提到《Shane》这部影片,看似时间背景人物都完全不同设置的两部影片,为什么会放在一起
虽然讲述的是五十年代发生在美国西部的故事,《Shane》并非传统意义上的西部片,没有漫天的黄沙,酒馆前的决斗,没有头戴牛仔帽,腰别小手枪,策马奔腾的荒野镖客,赏金猎人,等等。以Rufus Ryker为首的拓荒者从印第安人手中抢来土地用于放牧,他们是我们印象中的西部牛仔们。以Joe为代表的自耕农户们来到拓荒者的土地开垦农田,修建水渠,发展农耕文明以求安稳富庶的生活。双方斗争不断,原野游侠Shane路过小镇,尝试融入农耕生活,但在帮助Joe及农耕户们打击拓荒者之后,最终选择出走回归荒野。
Shane原本是来自荒野自由自在的游侠,敏感警觉,温柔幽默。没人知道他的过去,但每一个游侠独行久了,大概都会向往美丽贤惠的妻子,可爱机灵的孩子,或者一头荷兰奶牛,就可以让他留下。这里甚至有可以拔刀相助的不平事,一种使命感让Shane更加觉得自己或许属于这个地方。如果没有Ryker,也许Shane几乎可以毫无压力的融入这种安逸“文明”的生活,拥有和Joe一样美满的生活。
影片至此都似乎在宣扬游牧文明向农耕文明的转变是对人类更好的选择,也是无法改变的趋势。人们会放下枪,放弃掠夺,各自守护好自己的土地,相安无事地过和平的群居生活。直到Ryker和Joe那一场激烈且重要的辩论,开拓者历经艰辛夺下土地,自耕户却理所当然地各划地盘自给自足,究竟谁是谁非呢。
Joe作为先进文明的代表,成功指出抢来的土地原本就不属于开拓者,眼前的一切不过是相似的游戏不断的上演。文明的发展,时代的更迭,说白了都是个人在群体或自然中追求自我利益的最大化而已。
那么这些游荡在时代边缘的Shane们,又该何去何从呢?
我认为《Shane》最妙之处,在于所谓的留白。影片没有过多关于Shane的心理描写,他只是善良单纯的一个追寻自己内心的人,他们有无法磨灭的旧时代的特质,成长的经历决定了他们似乎只能适应一种生活,于是在时代的变革中徘徊犹豫,无所适从。当他们终于决定停下脚步尝试改变,最终却只能发现,拿起手枪的一刻才是真正的自我。影史上经典的一幕,也是《金刚狼3》中提及的,有点忧伤的说出了这些悲情英雄宿命般的心声。
Shane : Joey, what are you doing here
Joey : I'm sorry, Shane.
Shane: You don't have to be, you'd better run back
Joey: Can I ride back home behind you?
Shane: I'm afraid not, Joey.
Joey: Please! Why not?
Shane: I gotta be going on.
Joey: Why, Shane?
Shane: A man has to be what he is, Joey. Can't break the mould.
I tried it and it didn't work for me.
Joey, there's no living with a killing. There's no going back from one.
Rignt or wrong, it's a brand. A brand stick. There's no going back.
Now you run on home to your mother and tell her everything is all right.
There are't any more guns in the valley.
影片中最为出色的配角,是小Joey。虽然是Joe 的儿子,Joey却更像是Shane的传承者。他对Shane代表的游侠时代有强烈的向往,但在教化之下,又可以安心接收文明的新时代。Shane的出现满足了他对“野蛮”时代的好奇,但在他的人生中,这只会是一个插曲,最终他还是会回到父母身边,做一位新时代的文明人。时代在这里顺利的更迭,而曾经的游侠,最终只能回到荒野中去继续游荡,回到属于自己的安心之所。
故事说到这里,我终于明白,为什么金刚狼的终结篇会以对Shane的致敬结尾。Logan和Shane一样都是荒野中的游侠,善良单纯,所以他们的感情和能力极易被人利用,不论是看似救世主的X教授,还是自私暴戾的史崔克。Logan一次次尝试融入X教授所代表的文明新时代,但他看起来永远是个异类,像一个能力超群只会干活,却无法领会老板精神的优秀员工。他的善良和使命感让他无法遵从自己的内心,只能一直充当X教授的帮手为拯救全人类奉献。但始终会有一天,当他累了,看清了,后继有人了,他总要回到荒野中,回到属于他,自由平静的大地中去。没有人可以豢养一只狼,狼虽然孤独而悲情,但那是他们应该在的地方,无所谓对与错好与坏,过去或未来。
为《金刚狼3》而来
不是特别精彩的西部片,但是入选了"美国电影协会世纪百大"。能够入选,我猜是因为该片拥有最纯正的西部片DNA,完美诠释了建国初期的美国精神。
同样是开枪前话唠一大堆,莱昂内的节奏比这个好太多,同样是100多分钟不拿枪,约翰·韦恩比这个男主更压得住阵,艾伦·拉德还是太清瘦了【← ←正式沦为肌肉男爱好者了啊擦。。这也是我看过的最言情的西部片
Shane如同一个武侠小说中两肋插刀拔刀相助的大侠一般,是个非常浪漫而理想化的角色,作为一个枪法神准的高手,却没人知道他是哪里来(也没人问),最后挥一挥衣袖他悄悄地消失在地平线。难怪主角一家人都无可救药地爱上了他,不论男女😳。。
小男孩的视角导入起到关键作用~在酒吧的肉搏和枪击战当中,小男孩是直接且唯一的目击者。与片头,小男孩透过鹿角窥见Shane一致,也与Shane说:你是一个善于观察的人,相呼应。更重要是,我们透过小孩视角=摄影机,进入一种对Shane男神的无限崇拜当中,Shane形象得以凸显,我们从而被同化。
长相痴傻的牙缝男童很抢镜,shane和marian的感情处理很有含蓄美,shane和scarret两个男人一块砍树桩对视一笑的画面很有暧昧喜感。以shane这么一个游侠牛仔逞强除恶主持正义的故事,表现牛仔英雄的神话,也暗含对西部牛仔时代终结的无奈和惋惜。结尾小儿子Joey目送英雄纵马远去,是美国影视经典镜头。Jean Arther出演
多年之后重看这部电影,愈发觉得肖恩不仅是西部片历史上最迷人的主人公,他更是战后美国电影的一个精神图腾,在经历了那些无法言说的血腥的杀戮之后,孤独地流浪在一个个偏僻的城镇中,而宿命的枷锁捆绑着看似无拘无束的牛仔,他没有办法,必须去在那些枪战中击败对手,让鲜血再次沾满双手,然后继续走入萧瑟的暮色里,正如他来时的那样,见证了战争中的残酷死亡真正地改变了史蒂文斯,他的肖恩不会提及过去,更无法希翼未来,美好的感情流淌在这部电影的每个细节中,让它反而不像是部西部电影,但观众仍然会被一种强大的忧伤笼罩,肖恩与玛利亚的爱注定没有出口,在告诫儿子不要太崇拜肖恩后,她快速熄灭了油灯,因为她自己似乎也深陷其中,唯有黑暗才能掩盖她已发红的脸颊,肖恩真的有选择吗?“杀戮的时代结束了”他最后对乔伊说,但真的如此吗?
"I heard you are a low-down Yankee liar", The coming of Homesteaders with civilization and the end of the days of cattlemen and gunfighters.
太典型就是太传统,牧民与恶霸的土地之争来了为孤独的牛仔,节奏慢但是也不拖。结局不用想牛仔打死了恶霸又开始流浪。小孩子这个演员太不可爱演技不怎么样,因为这是个重要角色。琪恩·亚瑟仍是我最讨厌的女演员!
1.《苍白骑士》的原版;2.肖恩,一个过客,没有过往,没有传说,随风而来,留下几声枪响与一丝血腥味,不求名利,独自离去;3.结尾小孩对肖恩的呼唤,正是对西部时代、对英雄主义的呐喊与追忆。
不晓得咋说 哈哈哈哈 要是他们shane和他们一家都住一起那才叫好呢 他儿子都说 他爸需要他 他崇拜他 他妈需要他。。。。。。
A man has to be what he is. Can't break the mold.【狼3的整个剧情都base在这句台词上了.......
经典程式化的西部片,中间的剧情太拖沓,那个小男孩闹死了,问个不停也喊个不停。。。结尾算是对西部蛮荒社会&枪战解决问题的告别吧,进入法制时代。
舒缓也激烈,又回味无穷。这是一部蕴含深厚情感的西部片,拥有冷静的叙事和完美的画面,极致抒情而又不拖泥带水,它让人感受到的是人心最底层的那一份真挚。电影演奏了一首关于时代和雄性的优美挽歌,雄浑寂静、不过分悲伤,但营造了出色的留恋氛围,并给观众以无穷的内在力量。
以西部片的类型存量上看,可以理解某些评论指出的缺陷,特别是艾伦拉德所塑造的肖恩,俊朗干净到不像西部游侠而更像都市男偶,缺乏与剧情描绘相匹配的体魄信服力:一拳就把高他半头的本约翰逊揍出屋外。而从类型变量上看,本片确有独到之处。小孩的视角与其母的暧昧被普遍提及,凡赫夫林的小孩父亲被明显忽视。斯蒂文斯花费相当篇幅去表现这位自耕农不输给甚至超越西部游侠的信念和勇气,某些关键桥段通过取景&占位有意将其置于画面中心,将肖恩挤在帧边。甚至整个自耕农群体,面对牧场主霸凌行径,在合理呈现出性格差异反应多样的同时,整体上却是朝着主动抗争的大方向平移,无一家逃离峡谷,更有人战死沙场!这点严重区隔于《正午》的懦弱小镇。在民众与英雄的关系上本片比正午更积极。它的英雄反而是疲惫倦战的,要靠残酷现实和大众豪情去再度激活。
介于传统西部片与修正型反西部片之间的作品(1952年的《正午》开启了后者的潮流)。影片拥有令人悦目的风光摄影(外景实拍)和动听的主题配乐,不过节奏偏慢。剧作上区别于此前经典西部片的地方主要有三点:1.开启了“从荒野来,回荒野去”、以拯救他人与自我放逐为己任的法外英雄传统(后启《搜索者》、莱昂内&伊斯特伍德西部片,以及一系列超级英雄电影)。2.开始反思过往西部片对印第安人的歪曲丑化(Joe Starrett反驳Ryker的台词)。3.设置了小男孩Joey这一从头至尾的旁观者形象,并借此结构起观影者的视点,Joey与观众对西部片的期待合一。影片其余部分则与传统西部片别无二致,无论是文明/野蛮、农耕/放牧、家庭(女人)/独行(男人)的二项对立式,还是酒吧中的挑衅与决斗,都可以满足经典西部片影迷的口味。(8.0/10)
非常类型化的西部片,一系列二元对立,男主则是游走于两者之间的边缘人,是真正的“游侠”。对反派的逻辑也有呈现,让人看到归根结底,这就是一场从游牧到圈养的畜牧业升级过程中先进生产力与落后生产力之间的冲突。叙事精彩,不断铺垫冲突,暗示男主的身手,营造气氛,直到最后一泄如注。雇主Starret代表了诚实正直的小农场主,角色塑造得很到位。小男孩的视角有助于叙事,但太过絮叨,我恨不得掐死他。
西部片的另一种变奏,失意流浪的牛仔试图去融入田园生活,这种生活又被野蛮的牛仔打破,他的背水一战是对于过去的一种诀别,也是对于自己身份的强烈的归属。电影更像是一部西部田园生活图景,不像以前西部片里的沙漠风光,人物总是居无定所和抢夺杀戮,这里是一种更加恬淡的乡村景象,小溪、财源、聚会、放牧,和西部片里的恶略的环境形成巨大的反差。这给居无定所的牛仔肖恩来说是充满巨大诱惑力的,他渴望用丢弃牛仔的身份去换取另一种生活,甚至他把枪都从腰间卸下去购买作为牧民的衣物。《金刚狼3》里的英雄迟暮寻求归属但又无处可去的矛盾,是对这个西部牛仔的再次演绎,充满了对于失去的那个辉煌时代的缅怀和无奈,人物面临着新的选择,但是总是徒劳的,“每个人都有适合自己的生活,无法彻底改变”,狼叔的死和肖恩的离去,都是一个时代的终结。
小男孩好討人厭。
小男孩对着马背上的肖恩深情的呼喊,可以看作对那个西部拓荒时代的召唤、对西部英雄的神往、对逝去时光的追忆。从放牧到农耕、从拓荒时代的枪手到捍卫自耕民土地的英雄,这最后一场枪战后那个时代已是传说。肖恩和玛丽安(乔伊的妻子)之间的感情(应该是以前就认识)处理的细腻美好、让人感慨。