• 电影
  • 电视剧
  • 美剧
  • 韩剧

 量子

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 优质

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 红牛

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 非凡

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

刮痧

HD

主演:梁家辉,蒋雯丽,朱旭,霍利斯·休斯敦,塔玛拉·特恩特,斯蒂芬妮·沃格特,乔·尔克,卡特·道森,安东尼·穆林,马歇尔·菲尔,苏珊·弗莱,迈克·凯彻,乔·梅,桑尼·吴,戴夫·舒兹

类型:电影地区:大陆语言:英语年份:2001

 剧照

刮痧 剧照 NO.1刮痧 剧照 NO.2刮痧 剧照 NO.3刮痧 剧照 NO.4刮痧 剧照 NO.5刮痧 剧照 NO.6刮痧 剧照 NO.13刮痧 剧照 NO.14刮痧 剧照 NO.15刮痧 剧照 NO.16刮痧 剧照 NO.17刮痧 剧照 NO.18刮痧 剧照 NO.19刮痧 剧照 NO.20

 剧情介绍

刮痧电影免费高清在线观看全集。
电脑游戏设计师许大同(梁家辉 饰)与妻子简宁(蒋雯丽 饰)在美国奋斗了8年,事业有成。一次意外却令美好的家庭变得愁云惨雾:5岁的儿子生病了,老父亲(朱旭 饰)用传统的中国民间刮痧帮孙子治病。大同夫妻继而被控告虐待儿童,一个又一个物证人证令夫妻俩百口莫辩,西医根本无法了解这种传统中国疗法。因为这件事,父子与夫妻都不得已的分开了。大同伤心欲绝,面对儿子与妻子,他能做什么为自己伸冤呢?事情又能否得到圆满的解决呢?©豆瓣热播电视剧最新电影到店自取柯南和凯尔第一季阿诗玛新传最后的前线2020世界残酷奇谭 2蒙混过关换妆游戏最终剪接粉红豹2006世纪大阅兵慢行列车走过花季歌舞皇宫第一季避风港1971彩虹女神街角洋果子店真情陌生人(国语版)我,在贵州等你漂流者昙花梦大盛魁致奥利维亚马兰谣恋爱排班表加美拉对大恶兽吉隆让爱自由

 长篇影评

 1 ) 编得不好

基本上,剧情不太合理。梁家辉作为一个到美国生活了这么长时间的人,连不能够打孩子这么一点基本意识都没有吗?到了法庭上,本来几个词可以说清楚的事情,Chinese alternative therapy/massage,就是不说,光知道发脾气。如果不是有一个超级负责人的法官,这局面怎么收拾得了。要表现文化冲突也要合理一点才好啊。

 2 ) Analysis on Guasha Treatment from Intercultural Communication

   When a member of one culture produces a message for consumption by a member of another culture, intercultural communication occurs, which is a kind of communication between people whose cultural perceptions and symbol systems are distinctive enough to alter the communication event. People are alike and different. We carry our culture with us wherever we go, and it influences how we respond to the people we meet.
   The leading man in the movie Gua Sha Treatment has been in America for eight years as a new immigrant. At the beginning of this movie, the man, Datong addressed a speech in American way to show his love to America and American dream. It seemed that he has gained great success in the American mainstream society. Yet it was just an exaggeration of his success when used to make the comparison with the ensuing events.
   Datong and his wife were born and raised in China, while their son was a Chinese American. They taught their son in American way and spoke English all the time. In the celebration, we can find Datong was praised and encouraged by his boss, who can be taken as a representative of the mainstream business. At the party, because of the quarrel between the two children, the son, Dennis was beaten by his father, which is just a very common action in Chinese culture. The grandfather of Dennis also admitted the way of education. Because the other boy is the son of his boss, Datong gave his son a lesson to show his respect to the boss, who can not understand it at all. The boss was shocked and accepted it temporarily. In American culture, individualism is the key point of American cultural pattern, even between the father and the son. But in Chinese cultural pattern, fathers have the right or responsibility to educate the sons, no matter in a legal way or his personal way. We tend to take it as family privacy, instead of family violence or child abuse. In traditional Chinese culture, family conflict is often solved between family members and it’s a shame to spread family conflict outside of the house, while in America, the law and regulations make the difference.
   There was a very plain role in this movie, Lao Huo, the man who acted terra-cotta warrior, which was a loser in pursuing American dream compared with Datong. There were only the daily life and death of Lao Huo in this movie, which reflected the pursuit and struggling of an ordinary person in America. The death of him made the father of Datong think a lot, which was a clue to tell us the old man will return to China finally. According to the two different results of pursuing American dream, two different result of cultural conflict revealed.
   After the Gua Sha treatment rendered by the grandfather, Datong and his wife accepted it because of their Chinese culture background and the previous experience. It’s natural for the couple to keep the accident of child abuse secret to their father. And Datong confessed it was he who gave the treatment to the child, although his wife showed a little reluctance and hesitance. Actually his father gave the Gua Sha treatment to the son. There was an obvious culture difference in the episode. Chinese people behave on the basis of experience, while American act with the reference to the specific evidence. It’s praiseworthy for Datong to be a scapegoat for his father. In Chinese traditional culture, the law is important but sometimes affection counts. It’s dutiful and responsible to reduce the pains of parents both in China and America. If Datong admitted his father gave the treatment to the child and his to father will be accused by the court. Although it’s lawful, it’s unfilial in Chinese culture, which is an unforgivable fault.
Chinese view on interpersonal relationship network has been illustrated richly in this movie. When Datong needed a lawyer to help him, he sought help of his friend, who is actually not a lawyer of family law, but copyright law. Because of the lack of legal knowledge and the good relationship between them, Datong insisted on his help. Before the hearing commenced, Datong’s wife asked why the court was not the same as she saw before on TV. The tiny episode accounted for the difference between the judicial systems. Because Datong was in trouble, he turned to his friend for help, regardless of his professional field. Chinese weak legal consciousness was also criticized and satirized in this movie and Datong’s family became victims of culture shock.
   Although Gua Sha treatment is common and effective in China, we never tried to understand how it worked. We learned our culture from folk tales, mass media, and education. Culture is transmitted from generation to generation, so we never question the therapy. Everyone is a product of his own culture, it’s undoubted for American to have nothing idea about the treatment. But we can also find strong prejudice and ethnocentrism of America in the response to the case.
   The trial of this child abuse case could be regarded as the climax of this film. Datong’s family fights against the charge, which is an intense conflict between the Chinese and American cultures. Traditional medical treatment cannot be proved and admitted. They have no interest in proving why Gua Sha treatment is advisable but tried to prove how much the couple loves their son. The judgment and condemnation are just based on the scratch, the judge never showed a fair and sensible attitude to the medical treatment. Chinese classical book Journey to the West is considered from the negative perspective, even though the accuser knew it was wrong. The malicious and deliberated objection described American competition and materialism. The aim of the dispute is just for the victory in the court, regardless of the wicked ways. The prejudice and discrimination are two apparent obstacles in the intercultural communication. Moreover, the ethnocentrism of America was also perceivable. The judge and the accuser never showed justice to Datong’s rebuttal. Because of the ignorance of the treatment, they were very indifferent and pride to Datong’s statement. This uncooperative attitude made this event worse. It seems all of them are well-educated and civilized, but the communication problems repeatedly arose. Both of the parties held respective strong cultural background and different values, which have implemented enormous impact.
   Additionally, the stereotyping to Chinese or easterners are mentionable. When Datong said he hit his son to save his boss’ face, to make him feel better. The boss felt it was twisted and absurd. When Datong said it was a common sense to save his wife rather than the child, the female accuser said, your Orientals are barbarian. Stereotypes were a means of organizing our images into fixed and simple categories that we use to stand for the entire collection of people. In most distances, stereotypes are the products of limited, lazy, and misguided perceptions. In the movie, some Americans never delete their confirmation bias and tend to put Chinese to shame. Then, the failure in intercultural communication occurs.
   According to Hall’s high-context and low-context communication, the Asian mode of communication is often indirect and implicit, whereas western communication tends to be direct and explicit-that is, everything needs to be stated. Westerners are more prone to making very explicit statements and have little capability with nonverbal forms of expression. High-context cultures tend to be more aware of their surroundings and their environment and do not rely on verbal communication as their main information channel. According to the analysis of the movie, we can find the difference between high-context and low-context communication. At the beginning, Datong’s wife disliked the grandfather’s smoking, but she said nothing directly and opened the window. Certainly the grandfather understood it easily. On the contrary, Americans often get permission first. And if they want to show the objection, they spoke it out. But it’s not impolite and respectful to ask the elder not to do something. When Chinese show their anger, it is also implicit. Datong was very angry to his boss, because he has thought his boss would help him on this issue. Datong hoped his boss to support him, but the fact that the boss told everything straightforward, which was unfavorable to Datong. In Datong’s view, they were friends and it’s responsible for the boss to help him and he took the frankness of his boss as a kind of betrayal. He was unwilling to work there any more and planned to quit that job after no discussion with his boss. It’s normal to a Chinese man to show his anger and express their spilt relationship. From the perspective of the American, it has nothing to do with their friendship. It’s reasonable and lawful to tell the judge all the truth. They don’t show personal emotions in the business and persuaded Datong to work, which is a way to show his kindness and concern.
The ending of this movie is happy and warm. The boss understood Gua Sha treatment and Datong’s family gained reunion on the important western festival. No matter in East or West, family reunion and family love are enjoyable and happy. In the end, the grandfather educated and taught his son again. It was warm and moving because we can feel the father’s love; no matter he expressed his love explicitly or implicitly. The grandfather left America because he found it was troublesome and upset for a person like him to live in the Western culture. It was a failure for an elderly like him in intercultural communication, and it was a success for the young generation in America.
   The last episode in the movie was the boy’s learning mandarin, which was a strong contrast to the beginning of the movie, where the boy was educated to speak English to prepare for the competition of the future. No culture is more advanced than others and cultural diversity should be advocated and protected. Human brain is an open system and supposed to appreciate the diversity.
Finally, the name of the leading man in this movie, “Datong”, is also a Chinese Confucian classical term, which means great harmony. Obviously, the name was created with the implied meaning. “Datong” society is the perfect and ideal society in Confucianism, which conveyed the hope and wish of the movie producers. Although there are so many different countries, cultures, systems, races, etc, it’s a pursuit to build such kind of harmonious society without discrimination, prejudice, conflict, war…

 3 ) 如有一朝大同至,举世定将换新颜。

Because He Is Chinese: Chinese Immigrants’ Struggle for the recognition of American Society
—The Maze of Different Value Systems and The Disillusion of Those Outsiders’ Daydream

Brief Introduction to the Movie:
  Datong Xu and his wife Jian Ning have been lived in America for eight years; through struggle they have made great success in their career and with their son Dennis they live a very happy life.
Xu’s father comes from China to visit his family. While there, he gives his grandson a harmless traditional Chinese medical treatment of Gua Sha, which the local authorities wrongly regard as child abuse. The family goes through a very hard time when the child is taken away by the child protection agency. Meanwhile, the Xu’s father leaves America because he finds that the living environment is really not suitable for him, as he feels that Gua Sha, which is so common in China is treated as child abuse in America. Worst of all, he cannot converse in English.
Eventually, an American friend of Datong tries Gua Sha and proves that the treatment leaves painful-looking marks that are not actually harmful at all. And the end result sees that Dennis is returned home and the family is reunited.

Movie Analysis: with a focus on pieces taken from the movie
Value Systems deeply rooted in Different Cultures Do Make Clashes
As is shown to us, despite the fact that Datong, with his wife has been to the States for eight years, deep in his heart his root is in China and some of the most fundamental viewpoints of his are still typical Chinese style.
Scene one: at the very beginning of this movie Dennis and the son of Datong’s friend Quinlan have a fight and Dennis beats the other boy, then Dennis goes to play computer games. Let’s see what Datong has done to his son: he shuts down the computer, beats his son and asks him to apologize to Quinlan’s son, an act making the Quinlan family feel confused and puzzled.
Now you see, having lived in America has made Datong look like an American citizen and has gained him a good reputation as an American computer game designer; however, it fails to change his value system since he is brought up in China and mainly educated there. Family structure and their inherent relationships and obligations are a major source of cultural difference. (Xu, page 94) And differences between west and east in value systems occur, thus making the culture clashes: Quinlan never did this to his son, so he can’t understand Datong’s deed and feel quite surprised.
Scene two: at the hearing Datong shows his fury and “overacts” as he witnesses someone saying something bad about Chinese culture, making people present at the court feel so astonished.
As we all know, the curt is a sacred place and no one should be led by his own emotion and behave rudely to the judge, as this is an offense to sobriety of the law and the legal system. Complex as the scene may appear to be, what causes Datong’s deeds can be carefully reasoned:
Here again come the cultural clashes: American culture is so different from ours that they may not be able to correctly comprehend and decode our culture; this has caused the person who has said something bad about Chinese culture at the court misperceive our culture, which is a sad truth. When somebody misunderstands your motherland, what will you do? Of course we’ll fight back and defend our country, wherever and whenever. And this, is the very answer to Datong’s deeds at the court.
Cultural Conflicts and Its Causation
We should admit the fact that this is a movie full of cultural conflicts, among which the different opinions towards Gua Sha and the unhappy life of Datong’s father in America should be the most serious two. Gua Sha, along with the life experience of Datong’s father, can be taken as the two significant factors when we are studying the clue of this movie.
Scene Three: Dennis is taken away from Datong’s family because of the seemingly painful-looking marks left by the treatment Gua Sha.
Here the mark is taken for the testimony that Datong’s family has abused the child; however, Chinese people, as the inventor and practitioner of this traditional treatment, will never come to the conclusion that this is harmful to the patients. Unfortunately, probably no Chinese has thought of the problem that Americans don’t make sense of this treatment; and also, probably no Americans have realized that Gua Sha is not a punishment or abuse but a way to heal people’s illness.
Misconceptions from both sides has jointly led to the cultural conflicts, both sides need to retrospect themselves and communicate with each other, which in the movie we can hardly see. And the movie is the reflection of the reality, though a little unwilling to accept the fact, we have no choice but to face this serious problem: lack of understanding and interaction between different cultures.
Scene Four: Datong’s father, finding it extremely difficult to live in a totally different environment and feeling a sense of loneliness, finally leaves for China.
The life of an old person living in a foreign country is always a heated topic to be discussed. Today I’ll focus on the conflicts part:
The grandfather, symbol of the Chinese traditional culture and the Chinese past, is confronted with modern America and the contemporary American mainstream culture. It is obvious that these two differ in lots of aspects, and of course so many differences are to cause cultural conflicts, in which the Datong’s father is too weak to fight back and have no choice but to return to its own culture.
What has made a Chinese old man face those cultural conflicts? The reasons are as follows: living environment, language, worldview and values, etc. And in all those elements, I think the unfamiliarity of an unacquainted culture should be the most striking one.

Conclusion Part:
American Dream? So Hard to Achieve for a Chinese Immigrant
  Do you still remember the words said by Datong Xu at the start of the movie when he is addressing his prize-winning speech? In his speech he says that if he can keep working hard he will one day become a real, successful American, American as he has thought of is a country full of opportunities and he is the lively example, and at last he says he loves America and that’s his American Dream.
  Sarcastically, the start of the movie turns out to be Datong’s peak, and then both his career and his life have become worse and worse. It is certain that the family is reunited and things begin to become better, but you can’t deny the fact that Datong’s American Dream is actually ruined and disillusioned, maybe through time he will soon “recover”, but the pain left by the tragic memory of this incident is sure to last long.
  In his famous novel The Great Gatsby Fitzgerald wrote the famous sentence: So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past (Fitzgerald, page 224). American Dream is far away from those immigrants, the famous Chinese writer Zhu Ziqing has once said: “but the happiness is theirs, I have nothing.” And this theory can also be adapted here: the American dream is American’s, they immigrants have nothing. Even Americans themselves can’t easily realize their dream, how about immigrants?
  And what has made this? Of course the difference of culture and value systems! To solve this problem, we still have a long way to go.

  The name Datong means great harmony, I guess it is not only the ultimate goal of the director but also the ultimate goal of people all around the world. It comes as no surprise that it is of vital importance to realize this goal, but there still exist a great number of obstacles, especially in the aspect of culture and communication. What should we do? Just keep walking, keep fighting and trying hard to build bridges between different cultures and help them understand each other to fulfill our dreams.
  If one day the great harmony arrives, the world will take on a new look and the earth will make a true global village.

 4 ) Love Without Complete Understanding

这片子是最初在英语视听课上看了一点片段,觉得很感兴趣,今天刚好空了,于是在线把它看完了,最后我没想到我居然看哭了。
 
《刮痧》讲的是东西方的文化差异:从在街头卖画白手起家的许大同终于经过多年奋斗得到了美国上流社会的认可,因为想要全家团聚,把北京的老父亲接来美国同住。小孙子丹尼斯某日肚子疼,老父亲因为看不懂药瓶上的英文,于是便用中国传统的刮痧疗法给孙子治疗。不想后来孙子在社区医院的一次检查中被发现了背上的淤痕,因为被儿童福利机构认为有遭受虐待的嫌疑,大同夫妇遭到起诉。
影片中的大同虽然在影片一开始得奖时的感言全然表现出他以融入美国社会而自豪,但骨子里完全是个中国男人。他认为管教丹尼斯的那一巴掌是为了向他的老板兼好友SHOW THE RESPECT,后来在听证会上为了怕影响父亲的绿卡签证毅然说刮痧是他而不是他父亲做的,对听不懂英文的父亲一直隐瞒丹尼斯被儿童福利机构带走的事,为的是怕他担心。
作为我本人,并不喜欢这种压抑自己并超额为别人着想的做法,我们这一代人的思维方式已然是西化了。但我却在后来深深地为这样的一个父亲而感动:因为法庭认为大同是一个危险人物和不合格的父亲,为了能让丹尼斯回家,他们夫妻不得不分居;在那个脏乱的出租屋里,许大同颓废地酗酒;他的妻子简宁来看望他,劝他别喝了不听,便干脆同他一起喝起来(我很喜欢简宁这个角色,在我看来她是影片中对所有事情处理和适应得最好的一个角色),喝醉了以后,她骂他是个混蛋,大同醉醺醺地应道:“是,我是个混蛋。”俩人大笑,她又说:“那我是什么……婊子?”简宁也是开着玩笑想释放一下,没想到大同听到这句话却痛苦不已,把杯子和酒瓶都砸了,连续叫道:“不要这么说!”圣诞夜,丹尼斯在电话里要大同promise一定回家,他不知该怎么拒绝,最后答应了,我本以为这只是一个哄孩子的骗局(看来我是小时候被骗惨了= =)。接下来出现的场景是大同在寒风中在露天公园里为一只长毛绒玩具猴子画上孙悟空的脸谱,有人前来抢劫他,他把钱都掏了出来给劫匪,没想到劫匪顺手还牵走了那只猴子,结果刚才还表现懦弱的大同冲上去一下子把劫匪扑倒在地一顿狠揍,口中大骂:“你这混蛋!这是给我儿子的圣诞节礼物!”故事最后的高潮,就是大同扮成圣诞老人从楼房外的下水管道爬上九层楼给儿子送礼物的那一幕。此时他的老板,在他辞职时说“这是什么混帐中国逻辑”的好友,已经亲自去中国城体验了刮痧,并作为证据找到起诉方,争取到了对方同意取消诉讼,并且刚把这个好消息带给简宁。大同从窗口回到家中的那一刻,一家人相拥在一起,故事终于走向大团圆结局。
 
这部片子的人物塑造都比较典型,情节也是戏剧性的,一个巧合套一个巧合,所有的情节冲突显然是因为浓缩过了而显得很紧凑,所以看起来有一点为故事而故事的刻意。不过我认为这部片子的主要魅力在于故事本身的角度精妙而出色,倒不一定非要表现得那么不露痕迹。
我在看这部片子时想到的并不仅仅是文化冲突(主要在我的生活中没有感受相似经历的机会),而是两代人之间的时代差异会造成的沟通问题。影片中似乎没有这个问题,除了儿子丹尼斯不理解大同说“打你是因为爱你”算是一个吧。我比较多感受到的来自中国传统文化的要求都是来自于我的母亲以及母亲面上的亲戚们,虽然父亲也是个比较传统的人,但他对我要求的方式却未曾让我感受到有不适的压力。母亲的亲戚们是一个大家庭,在我看来他们整体上都“意识形态色彩浓厚”,非常地注重中国传统道德礼仪,这当然也造成了他们的凝聚力非常地强。不过我从小感受到来着大家庭的诸多要求,带给我的记忆大部分都可以说不那么愉快。如果让我给类似于“打你是因为爱你”这样的话做一个价值判断的话,我无疑要说它是错的,并且我可以打一屏的字来批驳它。
最近上课,有个老师在课堂上对我们说:“文明之间当然是有高下之分的,像菲律宾这样居然会有人去香港游客出事的巴士前照相的民族,就是活该被人殖民。”当时我心里头就感觉我不能同意这种观点。
(虽然菲律宾人这种做法确实很二。)
我所想到的是:是不是正因为现在西方文明的那一套占优、占主流、属于强势,所以大家都觉得这一套才对?以至于不符合他们的文明的标准的民族就活该受欺负了……这套逻辑似乎又是弱肉强食的逻辑了。那如果非文明的做法占优势,是不是大家都要去推崇非文明了?如果道德、文明的标准可以套用适者生存的逻辑,无疑是将道德本身虚无化了。而两代人的沟通也是如此,现在是因为长辈们人数占优而且我还得靠他们养着,所以我就得遵守他们的规矩,而有一天他们终要年老体弱,轮到我们这一代人的思维方式抬头,然后我们再成为给下一代施加压力的长辈?
 
前几天见辩论队群里俩人吵架,想当年我也是个容易生气和人吵起来的人,所以倒是很明白其中一方的心情。吵架本身就是因为双方在意的焦点不一样,用来评断是非的那套逻辑也不是一回事。但吵到最后,在相互指责中,双方都只会对自己的那一套逻辑越来越执着。这样的吵架在效用上是等于零的,但是感情不能仅仅用效用来计算,所以往往还容易没完没了。实际上,每个人从小生长的环境都不一样,都可能形成属于自己的一套“应该”和“不应该”的判断标准,但是这套标准经常和别人不一样,经常也和事实并不一样:比如说你认为会给别人造成麻烦的事,事实上对别人来说并没有那么麻烦;你认为是每个人都轻易可以并应该做到的事情,也许对别人来说很困难。不带着觉察的心经常去验证一下,就会以为自己的标准这才是唯一的评判标准。
我并不是要批评这种状态,我想说其实最多受到自己的判断标准的限制和束缚的正是这个人自己。尤其是在表达善意和传达善意的方式上,一个人的内心经过了充分的生长和发展之后,应当是能够灵活地以各种方式来传达爱与接收到爱,而不是将自己的唯一正确的意志加给身边的人——这反而是贫乏的表现。就像我从小被教成一个要强的孩子,整个少女时代都是一个完全不会示弱的人,而且看到别的女孩子不要强反而受到更好的照顾时,心里头的那种不是滋味很容易就化作了攻击性——其实这个攻击性也是由好强的逻辑来的,结果事情越弄越糟。
尝试一下自己不习惯的状态并不妨碍人回到原来的选择,只是选择范围放宽很多了而已,并且从此也对和自己评价体系不同的人没有了敌意:什么都是有代价的,大家不过是各取所需,必要时还应该相互帮忙呢。
 
我见到过一句话:Sometimes,we love somebody complately without complete understanding.
我想这正是为人父母所给予孩子的,尽管因为时代变化得太快,经常方法不对、甚至造成反效果,但它也只是某一种模式,他们也只是茫然地面对着这个大时代的小人物,无所适从。就像影片中的中国传统文化,我也觉得它有很多问题,美国人应该更不能理解,但是并不能因为那是在美国,不理解的人人多势众,就说它是错误的。大同的老板能够亲自去中国城尝试刮痧,这是普通人所做不到的体谅,反过来说,也正是因为他是一个有自信、有安全感的人,才不惧于去推翻自己原有的判断。一个越是恐惧不安的人,越是不会去做自己认为“不应该”的事,因为他恐惧的是那套评判逻辑建立之初关于受惩罚的记忆,虽然实际上这种威胁可能早就不存在了。
面对一种自己不明白的评价机制,我想我们所能做到的只有耐心一点……再耐心一点……直到找到双方相处最合适的位置、距离和方式,不仅仅是对不同的文化,对长辈父母与后辈,对两性之间的心理差异,对怎样和不同的性格的人相处……这样说着,就想到自己做得并不好,基本还是别人宠着我。
不过我想:正如影片中那样,即使美国人不能理解中国人的思维,但最终能允许大同一家按照他们的方式生活,这本身对他们来说就是莫大的幸福吧。知道世界上不是只有一种正确的生活,不去对别人的生活方式指指戳戳,这也算是最简单的与人为善的方式了吧。

 5 ) 电影《刮痧》观后感

       这学期观看了同学推荐的电影《刮痧》,在影片的最后听见丹尼斯可爱稚嫩的声音,他在随着父母的教授念着:“中国、北京、长城……”我顿时百感交集,是喜悦,是愤慨,还是无奈?不知道该用怎样的语言来表达看完这部电影后的感受。我认为,《刮痧》是一部非常优秀的电影作品,适合不同文化程度的观众观看,具有诸多的成功之处。影片中的很多细节都给我留下了十分深刻的印象,因此想在这里跟大家分享一下。
    电影《刮痧》是一部反映中美文化冲突的影片,故事发生在美国中部密西西比河畔的城市圣路易斯。来美已经八年的许大同,事业有成家庭幸福,他把在北京生活的老父亲接到美国同住。一天,五岁的儿子丹尼斯闹肚子发烧,他的爷爷由于刚从北京到美国,不懂得药品上的英文说明,便用中国民间流传已久的刮痧疗法给丹尼斯治病,没想到这竟成了丹尼斯一次意外事故后许大同虐待孩子的证据。在法庭上,面对对刮痧这一传统中医疗法一无所知的美国法官,面对一个又一个意想不到的证人和证词,许大同有口难辩。法庭宣布剥夺许大同的监护权,不准他与儿子见面。一连串的矛盾冲突更是接踵而来,一个原来幸福美好的家庭就这样转眼间变得支离破碎……
    电影中的很多细节是值得咀嚼和深思的。一开始,许大同就说:“我爱美国!这里是我的家!”八年的美国生活已经让他有自信说自己是美国人,并且和其他美国人一样自豪地称爱国。但无论他的英文说的如何字正腔圆,心里对美国梦、美国生活有多么的热爱和眷恋,他骨子里的中国传统文化所根植的意识形态和思维方式却怎么也改变不了,这使得他在官司中处处碰壁。在为他举办的颁奖仪式上,丹尼斯和朋友的儿子打架,他会为给朋友面子而当众体罚自己的孩子,并坚称“打是疼骂是爱”,老爷子指出他这是“当面教子背后教妻呀”。后来,因为刮痧的事情他被指控“虐待儿子”,听证会上对方律师请来他那位上司证明他是否真的动手打过儿子,这位上司不敢对法官撒谎只能回答“yes”,许大同据此认为上司出卖了他而提出辞职,上司认为他所谓的因为尊重上司而打自己的儿子是不可理喻的“中国逻辑”时,许大同用汉语脱口而出“道不同不相与谋”。听证会上对方请的另一个证人是当年给他儿子接产的护士,这位护士指出他在危急时刻曾经说过“保大人不管小孩”,他又一次用汉语脱口而出“留得青山在,不怕没柴烧”,可见他在说出满口纯正英语的时候,骨子里根深蒂固的还是“中国式”思维。也许这就是中国美籍华人(或称移民)的生存状态:已经脱离了生长自己身体和灵魂的祖国,飘洋过海努力奋斗,但要最终融入这个文化、政治、意识形态完全不同的社会却又是那么困难。以至于在美国,他们好像是“东方人”,虽有绿卡但仍与美国普通民众格格不入,黑头发、黄皮肤是他们的一个“异类”标签;而和中国人比起来,他们又是不同的,他们在家里也要说一口纯正的英语,他们口口声声说自己爱美国,他们努力退去身上的中国印。同时,美国社会也是矛盾的对待着他们的,它接受他们作为它的子民,作为国家的成员,但在社会实际生活中却无处不存在着对东方人、黄种人(矛头指向的就是华裔)却充满了歧视、轻蔑和误解。最可怕的是,当这种误解、歧视和轻蔑和美国号称“民主、法制、科学”的政治、法律结合起来,就会产生如电影《刮痧》中一样看似闹剧,却让人看得轻松不起来的事情。
    美国人不了解中国的刮痧,法律上也不承认其合法性,许大同在听证会上很激动地讲着“人体的七经八脉像无数小溪流向江河又奔向大海,气发自丹田又回到丹田……”,没有一个法官或是律师能够听懂,他们要求找医学权威来证明,可是这样的权威在美国根本就没有,于是案情的发展越来越让人揪心甚至愤慨:儿子丹尼斯只能被放在福利院,和被父母抛弃的孩子生活在一起,以至于他认为父母是要抛弃自己;许大同这边的辩护却一次次失利……从《刮痧》中,我们看美国的法制,会发现一个很奇怪的现象:在这个社会政治和法律系统里,每一个人都在努力维护这个系统的健康、透明而民主的运转,因此会有揭竿而起报警的医生和护士,有为孩子的健康和权利而舌战不休的律师,有以说实话为自己责任的证人;但当遇到了他们所不理解或不了解的事情的时候,当另一个遥远国度的传统文化和他们的common sense产生冲突的时候,这种西方社会科学、严谨、民主的法律却成为他们固守自己偏执的一种武器,就如那个律师在法庭上故意惹怒许大同、用刻意曲解《西游记》的手段误导法官以达到自己赢得官司的目的。
    影片在后半部分有不少感人的镜头,老爷子找到许大同的朋友——一个做版权辩护的律师约翰,连比划带画图告诉他不是许大同给丹尼尔刮的痧,而是他刮的。约翰问许大同的妻子——蒋雯丽扮演的简宁:“为什么他在法庭上要说是他做的?”简宁回答:“因为他是中国人。”这真是一个意味深长的答案!大同和他的父亲、大同和他的儿子、老爷子和孙子之间发生的故事,皆因为他们是中国人,在中国司空见惯的事情与道理,到了美国却说不清楚了,一个深爱儿子的父亲被指控“虐待孩子”,却没有办法证明自己的无辜。
    故事的转折是从律师约翰这里开始的。约翰自己找了一个中医去体验刮痧,这位中医一边用英语给他介绍刮痧的原理,一边在他后背上刮出了深深地痧痕,然后让他用镜子看自己的后背,问他是否感觉这是“虐待”,约翰终于明白了一切。圣诞节的夜晚,约翰去找原告方,告诉对方他有一个“两千年的理由”。而另一边,大同和妻子协商了分居,这样儿子好歹可以和妈妈在一起,而爸爸则不允许靠近。圣诞节的夜晚,这位痴情的父亲因为被保安拒绝回到自己家里而选择了爬窗户,他扮演成圣诞老人从一层爬到了自家九层的窗户上,整个过程有惊无险,一家人终于团聚,约翰和原本起诉他们的劳瑞娜一起来告诉他们:法官已经撤回了禁令。” 最终,西方的法制和东方的传统在经历了苦难和艰苦的磨合后达到了一种“和解”和“融合”,孩子回到了父母的身边,妻子和丈夫也不再需要痛苦的分离。
    这真的是一部优秀的电影,不同文化之间的差异与冲突是主题,表达了作为移民的中国人在一个民主、法制但又充满对别国文化、尤其是中国传统文化误解的美国如何生存,如何融入美国的社会和政治生活,天生的不适应和排异性又让这种融合变得异常困难。但故事的结局是好的,我想,这个结局除了安慰台下心里早就为许大同遭遇感慨的观众们之外,更多的是想重复一个被外交家、政治家们重复了千万遍的真理:“无论是怎样的文化沟壑,只要相互交流就能达到谅解。”
    《刮痧》中的刮痧,刮在孩子身上,刮在美国的法制身上,刮在美籍华人的心上,也刮在了我们每一位观众的心上。也许刮后印记难看,但温热微暖的感觉,却总是好的。“人之初,性本善”,正是因为人性中有共通之处,异质文化才有了从冲突到融合的可能。融合来源于真心的交流,希望在不久的将来,一个“大同”的世界真的会出现在我们面前!

 6 ) 中国式与美国式的冲突 (电影中的法律的作业,搬过来了)

影片《刮痧》向我们展示了华人在美国由于法律制度和社会习惯等的不同而产生的一系列冲突。这种冲突可以称作中国式与美国式的冲突,以下是我观看完影片后的一点感受。 中国人和美国的社会,当这两者组合在一起的时候本身就有一种矛盾效果,中国人应该存在于美国社会,美国社会应该容纳的是美国人。而当中国人进入到美国社会后会发生什么呢?影片刮痧就向我们阐述了这样的一个故事。由于影片题材就充满了戏剧性,所以影片本身也充满了戏剧张力。 影片一开始是一场颁奖典礼,在礼堂的外面聚集了一批游行示威者在进行示威游行,用大同的老板约翰的话说就是“宪法规定的那一套言论自由”。他们反对暴力游戏,所以也抵制这个以游戏为主元素的颁奖典礼。在这里中国式与美国式的矛盾就已经产生了:在美国这种游行非常普遍,只要人们对某件事情不满就可以上街游行,人们反对总统某项决议的游行也不在少数;但在中国游行的情况是很少的,游行可以与暴力划上等号,更不要说去反对党和国家的决策了。颁奖典礼的大奖被男主角许大同拿到了,他是一位来美国已经八年的移民。在礼堂内,中国式与美国式的矛盾又爆发了,大同的儿子丹尼斯打了约翰的儿子,大同于是就当着约翰的面打了丹尼斯。这是中国式的“当面教子,背后教妻”,也是中国式的要给老板面子。影片后来约翰对大同的这一行为是这么评价的:“给我面子?好不可理喻的中国逻辑!”至此影片在颁奖典礼的这一段告一段落。 回到家,爷爷给丹尼斯进行了刮痧——the Chinese medical treatment.影片的导火线就此埋下。回到家里,一家人还在谈论着白天大同打丹尼斯这件事。丹尼斯说出了美国式的理解:“打小孩的爸爸不是好爸爸。”爷爷也说出了一个中国式的理解:“打是亲骂是爱,不打不骂不成材。”这可以说是礼堂里中国式与美国式的冲突在家里的延伸。刚来到美国的爷爷特别不适应在美国的生活:不能抽烟,听不懂别人在说什么,不能和美国人交流,老朋友老霍的去世…在我看来,爷爷的不适可以代指大同心里的中国式情结,这种中国式情结在美国社会没有生存空间,导演将大同内心里不适应美国的地方,通过爷爷的不适外化了出来。大同表面上是一个加入美国籍的移民,其内心实际上还是一个中国人,他是“披着美国皮的中国羊”,他内心的中国式在后面的表述中我们就可以看到。我在想一个问题,一个在美国生活了八年的人,其作为怎么还像一个才去美国的人呢? 老霍心脏病突发死去,大同留下丹丹一个人在家去警察局接爷爷,在这个过程中简宁给家里打了个电话,吵醒了熟睡中的丹丹,故事发展到这里,刮痧的导火线就要被点燃了。中国式与美国式的第三个冲突也产生了。在美国单独把孩子留在家里是犯法的,而在中国这种事情在很多地方是司空见惯的。醒来的丹尼斯摔倒了,大同带他到医院缝合伤口,医院的医生发现了丹丹背后由于刮痧导致的“伤痕”,他们以为大同在家里虐待丹丹,于是把这一情况通知了医院的社工。至此影片最大的中国式与美国式的冲突产生了:在中国刮痧是一种传统的中医疗法,而在美国医生们根本就没有听说过刮痧。儿童福利局怀疑大同虐待丹丹,要把丹丹带走,这时候大同的冲动性开始显露了,并且暴露的淋漓尽致。他大声嘶吼着,拒绝警察将丹丹带走。在影片中,大同给了我两个最深刻的印象:冲动和固执。这一次他不顾警察的阻挠去抢孩子,就不利于事态的发展,他应该冷静下来,冷静才是处理好事情的前提。他的冲动和固执在下面还会有叙述。 第一次听证会前,中国式与美国式的第五个冲突发生了:大同请了约翰•昆兰——他的老板,作为他的辩护律师。在中国请熟人帮自己办事情是很正常的,中国的律师也基本可以应付所有类型的诉讼;而在美国,人们选择帮自己办事情的人的标准是他的职业素质,美国人考虑他有没有能力代理,是不是这方面的专家,而不是着重考虑是不是自己的熟人。在听证会上,第六个冲突发生了:大同说了谎,他把刮痧的事揽在了自己身上,顶替了爷爷。约翰在后来问过简宁大同为什么要这样做,简宁回答说:“Because he’s Chinese.”中国式的思考是要替爷爷顶罪,毕竟上法庭是件“不光彩的事情”;美国式的思考是不能撒谎,上法庭也没有什么,跟家里没什么两样,你看那法官多么幽默啊。大同在法庭上又发怒了,坚持孙悟空是正义的化身,他也固执的一再坚持自己没有错,刮痧没有错,那是中国传统中医疗法。这一次大同的冲动和固执两者都暴露出来了。孙悟空和刮痧都没有错,但大同的发怒显然不利于事件的处理。大同一直坚持刮痧只不过是中国的传统中医疗法,他一直在说中国什么什么的,但他没有想过在中国合法合理的事情在美国就不见得合法合理了,而他现在就是在美利坚的国土上。 由于儿童福利局没有提供证据副本以及辩方律师的不对口,法官决定举行第二次听证会。这是中国式与美国式的第七个冲突:在中国不会为了这点鸡毛蒜皮的小事而对案件进行重新审理;而在美国由于追求绝对的公平,它就会进行重新审理。美国法庭的审理与中国很不一样,不管是在证人的站位还是在法官行使的角色上。这是中国式与美国式的第八个冲突:美国法庭审理的主角是律师,一个案件能否打赢的关键就是律师,人们作判断的是证据,先入为主的观念很少;而中国的法庭在审理案件时,主角是法官,案子在未审理时,其实是非曲直已经明了,人们有一个先入为主的观点在里面。在美国的法庭审理中,律师关心更多的似乎是怎样去打赢这场官司,而不是我的当事人是否真的触犯了法律。律师们会玩文字游戏,用他的口才来“拷问”证人。当事人和证人陈述时也会句句斟酌,尽量不让人抓到把柄。在听证会上控方律师甚至把给丹丹接生的女医生也请来了,可见美国人的煞费苦心,也说明了美国档案管理的完备,这在中国是不可能的。 当我们注意大同的老板约翰时,中国式与美国式的第九个冲突出现了:约翰可以去做证人证明大同虐待儿童,但到后来大同要走时也在尽力挽留大同,这在中国是不敢想象的;中国人只会想到老板“背叛”了自己,还来装好人,殊不知是个人的价值观在作怪。美国人信奉绝对正义,在正义面前他们似乎是不讲人情的。 听证会上,大同打输了官司,丹丹暂时由儿童福利局收养。爷爷想回中国,他更习惯跟北京的老朋友在一起。大同送爷爷来到机场。这时候大同又冲动了,大同想当一位孝子,他把丹丹偷偷从幼儿园带了出来,准备带着丹丹和爷爷一起回中国,爷爷果断制止了大同这种鲁莽的行为,一个人坐上了飞往北京的航班。中国式与美国式的第十个冲突出现了:大同成了通缉犯,在电视上进行直播,美国人的信息传达至迅速,对“小问题”的依依不饶,都让人咋舌;在中国为了这样一件事进行通缉甚至追捕是不可想象的。后来七辆警车在追捕大同,跟追捕一个通天大盗一样。我个人觉得这也许是中国人和美国人对法庭和警察的认知态度不一样造成的。中国人总是把警察与做了坏事联系在一起,美国人总是不把警察与坏人联系在一起,警察是市民权利的捍卫者,是市民的朋友,美国人当中上过法庭的也不在少数。 后来大同的老板约翰去了中国城,让中国的传统中医给他进行了一次刮痧,他的后背出现了与丹丹一样的三道伤痕,但他并不感觉疼痛,于是他相信了大同并没有虐待丹丹。约翰和福利局的女职员联名要求法官撤回对大同的起诉,于是丹丹又重新回到了大同的怀抱里,影片到此结束。 这部九十年代公映的电影给我们展示了一个中国人由于不熟悉美国的法律制度而引发的种种冲突,看完让人深思,也让人更加了解了美国。不知道这种类型的电影在当今的中国上映会不会有市场,我想基本是没有的。而在当今我们似乎更需要这样的电影带给我们思考,带给我们冲击。现在的矛盾跟过去相比有过之而无不及,我们需要这样的电影,在以后的学习生活中我也会多看几部这样的电影。

 短评

Because hi's a Chinese.

4分钟前
  • EvaneScencE
  • 推荐

过于煽情了,这种对亲情的过度渲染是一个的败笔,好消息是梁家辉继续着稳定的、高质量的表演输出,他真是唯一一个放在内地、香港、台湾任何一部电影里面都让人不会觉得太突兀的好演员,另外把他放到东南亚电影,比如越南电影也不突兀,真难得!PS还是觉得表现东西文化差异的片应该讲究含蓄、点到为止。

5分钟前
  • sonnet
  • 还行

美国人真的是事妈

6分钟前
  • 单线程青年
  • 力荐

不是简单在说文化冲突了,更重要的是对两种文化中的权力关系不对等一种发泄,梁家辉的歇斯底里,更多是作者面对这种文化权力结构的歇斯底里。

8分钟前
  • 推荐

我觉得最后的理解显得有点一厢情愿,毕竟东西文化之间的沟壑何止千万。我不懂的是,为什么蒋雯丽和梁家辉说话也要说英文啊,都是中国人好么。以及,外国佬真是少见多怪,刮痧就是虐待,那还有饮尿放血拔火罐刮骨疗伤的呢。。

11分钟前
  • 鬼腳七
  • 还行

朱旭老爷子真心NB,蒋雯丽演得也很出彩,但是,演得最好最好的,还是梁家辉啊。梁家辉是真正的影帝!

15分钟前
  • Relex
  • 推荐

当中国文化撞向美国文化……不过而今中医在外国人中已经渐渐盛行起来了,外国人在养生方面并不是太无知的

16分钟前
  • Reynard
  • 推荐

A little bit too dramatized. But still a good story and it was shot in St. Louis. 8.5 out of 10

19分钟前
  • 我呼吸的空气
  • 推荐

culture strike什么的 真的很恐怖啊... 不知道为什么分没想象中高 父子情 中国文化描述的也很不错 就是最后结局有那么点夸张了 爸爸 你为什么从窗户进来啊? 因为我们家没有烟囱.... 还有 蒋雯丽真漂亮

23分钟前
  • 🐟
  • 力荐

内容4星,片子3星。朱旭5星。

24分钟前
  • 熊阿姨
  • 推荐

为了主题而故事的痕迹过重,不过梁家辉在片中依旧延续着其高质而稳定的演出,他是我眼中唯一能被任意放置在港、台、大陆等各地影片中却不显突兀的演员~~

26分钟前
  • 战国客
  • 还行

挺感人的,戏剧冲突很浓烈,也是真人真事改编.听说小孩到现在也没有回到父母身边

27分钟前
  • MIA
  • 推荐

表现得并不仅仅是表层的文化差异 更是对这种文化差异处在一种极度不对等不公平的环境之中的无奈和批判 但是夫妻俩边喝酒边互骂一段拍得太做作了【为生在中国 能够有机会接触了解西方文化而感到庆幸 而不像西方社会对东方文化存在太多的误读和曲解 其实这也算是一种文化的闭锁吧?

30分钟前
  • 凹凸代餐
  • 还行

梁家辉演的真的好

32分钟前
  • 瓦达西瓦又又又桑只爱这巧克力
  • 推荐

看着很心酸,文化差异造成的误解把事情变得天差地别,孩子被隔离,丈夫辞了职,老头回了国,夫妻分了居。都说美国好,我们说的礼俗、文化,他们不懂,什么叫孝顺?什么叫棍棒底下出孝子?当然现在也是提倡讲道理,但有些孩子很皮,讲道理听不进去。梁家辉和朱旭演的很好

36分钟前
  • 瑶瑶
  • 推荐

听过法律基础老师上课喜欢放电影了 上次放的《秋菊打官司》 这次放的《刮痧》他以法律与文化作为开题 根据他的法律视角的解读 部电影的主要矛盾在与 自然法和分析法的矛盾 当然其中还提及文明的冲突 法律工作者的形象 亲情 爱情等等 赞同蒋雯丽演得太假了 结尾比较苍白

39分钟前
  • Manchild
  • 还行

还是表现文化差异。这是一种双边误会,美国法律误解中国文化,中国人情误解了美式人权。表达叙述之中有太多中国国产大陆剧的煽情手法了。梁家辉和蒋雯丽的表演可圈可点,但是不得不说朱旭老爷子,哎哟,每次见到他的表演,气定神闲,游刃有余,唯有钦佩。7.4

44分钟前
  • 巴喆
  • 还行

讲述中美差异,治病的刮痧竟成了犯罪的铁证,为接回孩子,夫妇俩竟闹得分居,听起来荒诞却又是事实影片里的蒋雯丽可真美,梁家辉饰演的丈夫把我气得要死,莽撞无脑,冲动易怒,净帮倒忙……电影整体不错,演员演绎得都很好,部分剧情生硬也无伤大雅

47分钟前
  • 你在百花深处
  • 推荐

跨文化交际上老师播放的影片。刮痧在中国本来是很正常很普遍的,但在外国却成了虐待儿童,所以有时候很有必要了解各国文化差异,避免此类麻烦。

49分钟前
  • 酒鬼一家小迷妹
  • 推荐

对于“美国”而言,《刮痧》似乎有所洞察,而有理有据,单手从开场对于Video Game=Violence的抗议再到文本自身的冲突设置均表明:除却对于“西方人对于刮痧的误解”之外,它本身是政治问题而不是社会—文化的问题,开场男主人公许大同对于“美国梦”的陈述并非反讽,真正的反讽在于左翼—民主党话语之下的自以为是,回到影片开场,是否会让人回忆起希拉里一派对于GTA的强烈反对态度?究竟是谁在限制Diversity?但是《刮痧》并不是美国共和党的宣传片,而是中国90年代文化的余波,“镜城”的其中一面(借用戴锦华的比喻),相对于李安的Multi-Cultural文化背景,它却站在“中国”的主体性,满足了官方话语所急需的“国学价值”之复兴,但令人欣喜的是,导演依然从中埋藏了些许“私货”。

50分钟前
  • 墓岛GRAVELAND
  • 还行